Learn about TherapyPM’s mission and vision.
Hear what our users say about TherapyPM.
Connect TherapyPM with the Tools You Already Use
Grow with Us: Partner to Expand Your Business Opportunities
Earn Rewards by Sharing TherapyPM with Your Network
Re-credentialing is not just a one-time process; it’s a continuous process that determines your practice’s reimbursements.
For many therapy practices, credentialing still feels like a milestone. As providers receive approval from insurance payers and get claims paid, their attention naturally shifts to patient care, staffing, and growth.
Unfortunately, here’s where providers usually make a wrong assumption. They believe credentialing is finished just after completing enrollment. But in reality, re-credentialing for therapists is an ongoing requirement that quietly determines whether a practice will get paid or not.
Missed or delayed re-credentialing is one of the most common reasons why insurance payers suddenly cease to pay. Sometimes, practices continue providing services over weeks without realizing that their provider status is under review or removed from the network entirely. By the time the issue is discovered, revenue has already been lost.
Re-credentialing does not come with loud warnings or clear deadlines. Insurance payers sent notices via email, which get buried under payer portals, or tied to CAQH activity. Growing practice often miss these signals until payments get disrupted.
This guide explains what re-credentialing for therapists really means, how often it happens, why clinics miss deadlines, and how proactive maintenance can protect revenue and network status.
Re-credentialing for therapists is a recurring process that is used by insurance payers to confirm whether a practice or provider consistently meets their participation requirements. While initial credentialing establishes network access, re-credentialing ensures access remains valid over time.
What do Payers Typically Verify During Re-credentialing?
This process usually occurs every 24 to 36 months, depending on the payer. Medicare, Medicaid, and commercial insurers each follow their own cycles, timelines, and review standards.
Here’s the critical issue: Re-credentialing is mandatory. Even practices with perfect billing history can be suspended or terminated from a network if re-credentialing is incomplete or late. Payers assume providers are actively tracking and responding to these requirements.
For therapy clinics, re-credentialing is not administrative housekeeping. It is a compliance requirement that directly determines whether services remain billable.
Most therapy practices are surprised to learn how frequently re-credentialing occurs. While two to three years may sound infrequent, managing this across multiple payers and providers quickly becomes complex.
Practices miss re-credentialing deadlines for several common reasons:
As clinics grow, manual tracking becomes unreliable. Even a single missed deadline for a provider can disrupt billing across dozens of patient visits.
Many clinics assume payers will follow up repeatedly if something is missing. In reality, some payers issue limited notices and proceed with suspension or termination if there is no response.
Re-credentialing failures are rarely intentional. They are usually the result of operational overload and fragmented tracking.
When therapists delay or miss re-credentialing, the consequences can escalate quickly. Practices often continue providing care without realizing their network status has changed.
Common outcomes include:
One of the most damaging aspects of re-credentialing failure is that claims provided during a lapse are often not retroactively payable. Even if re-credentialing is later approved, payers may refuse to reimburse services delivered during the gap.
This results in direct revenue loss that clinics cannot recover. For high-volume therapy practices, the financial impact can be severe and immediate.
Beyond billing, network disruptions affect patient trust. Families may face unexpected costs or be forced to switch providers, damaging long-term relationships.
Re-credentialing issues directly impact billing performance and cash flow. When providers fall out of network, claims may sit unpaid for weeks or months while the issue is investigated.
Healthcare revenue cycle studies consistently show that credentialing-related denials take two to three times longer to resolve than standard claim errors. In many cases, they are never paid.
For therapy clinics, this leads to:
Unlike clinical challenges, billing disruptions often appear suddenly and cascade quickly. Clinics that rely heavily on insurance reimbursement are especially vulnerable.
This is why re-credentialing for therapists should be viewed as a revenue protection strategy, not paperwork.
CAQH is one of the most common failure points in re-credentialing. Many payers rely heavily on CAQH data during credentialing reviews.
Problems arise when:
Even minor inaccuracies in CAQH can delay re-credentialing approvals. Payers often pause reviews until CAQH issues are corrected, which can push clinics past payer deadlines.
CAQH maintenance is not optional. It is a core dependency of re-credentialing success.
Many practices attempt to manage re-credentialing internally using spreadsheets, reminders, or shared inboxes. While this may work for very small practices, it becomes risky as practices scale.
Internal tracking challenges include:
Managed re-credentialing shifts this responsibility to dedicated specialists who track deadlines, maintain CAQH accuracy, and communicate with payers proactively.
Practices that outsource re-credentialing benefit from:
The decision is not about losing control. It is about reducing risk and protecting revenue.
TherapyPM helps clinics manage re-credentialing for therapists via structured tracking, proactive maintenance, and dedicated credentialing support. The goal is to prevent disruptions before they affect billing.
TherapyPM supports re-credentialing by:
The credentialing software helps therapy practices keep operations predictable while taking control over administrative tasks.
Re-credentialing for therapists is common yet overlooked risk in therapy practice operations. Practices invest heavily in growth, but missing even a single deadline can quietly deter months of progress.
When practices fail to do re-credentialing, it can negatively affect billing and payer relationships, causing frustration for staff and families. This is akin to the saying, “Prevention is better than cure”.
Always consider re-credentialing as an ongoing operational priority, so your practice can remain stable, confident, and resilient in the long-term. Whether managed internally or through expert support, this protects the foundation of insurance-based care.
To receive clarity on your current re-credentialing status and potential risks, it is advisable to discuss with credentialing experts so they can help identify gaps before they impact revenue. Book your free consultation to review your re-credentialing timelines, CAQH status, and payer compliance with us!
Re-credentialing is a recurring review conducted by insurance payers to confirm that a therapist or practice still meets all participation requirements. It helps you stay active in payer networks and receive reimbursements.
Most commercial payers require re-credentialing every 24-36 months. Medicare and Medicaid follow their own timelines.
Missing a deadline can result in claim denials, payment holds, temporary suspension, or full network termination. Services provided during a lapse are often not required.
Yes. Payers send notices through email, payer portal, or CAQH alerts, but they arrive indirectly, and therefore, easy to miss. That’s because payers often assume that providers are monitoring these channels. However, the best thing providers can do is check spam folders in emails regularly.
Payers typically verify licenses, malpractice insurance, CAQH accuracy, practice locations, ownership details, and disclosure responses.
In most cases, no. If a provider falls out of network, payers may refuse to reimburse services delivered during the lapse, even after restoring approvals.
Many payers rely heavily on CAQH data. If CAQH is outdates, un-attested, or missing documents, re-credentialing can be delayed or denied.
TherapyPM tracks deadlines, manages CAQH updates, monitors expirations, submits applications, and communicates with payers to prevent network lapses.
It’s important to address re-credentialing lapses at the earliest to prevent further revenue loss.
